Kevin Federline’s legal professional responds to Britney Spears safety claims

Kevin Federline can be livid if the claims that his kids’s non-public conversations with mother, Britney Spears, had been secretly recorded show to be true, his legal professional completely tells Web page Six.

“I think that would be pretty outrageous and Kevin would be upset about that,” lawyer Mark Vincent Kaplan instructed us on Monday, following The New York Times’ bombshell report over the weekend that first uncovered the allegations.

“It would be extremely inappropriate for a parent, let alone a grandparent, to clandestinely procure recordings between a parent and their children,” the legal professional added. “No matter whether or not or not the grandfather, on this case, Jamie is a conservator or not.”


In response to The Occasions, Jamie, 69, and the security agency he employed, Black Field Safety, ran an “intense surveillance apparatus” that monitored Britney’s communications and “secretly captured audio recordings from her bedroom, including her interactions and conversations with her boyfriend and children.”

Kaplan instructed Web page Six he and Federline, 43, had by no means heard of the allegations previous to our name and that he had “no way of knowing whether the allegations are true.”

Reps for Jamie and Edan Yemini, the top of Britney’s safety group, couldn’t instantly be reached for remark.

Kaplan instructed us regardless of not figuring out if the claims had been fully true, he stated he doesn’t assume “it would be appropriate” for Black Field to “continue on” as Britney’s safety if the allegations are correct.

He defined that “clandestine electronic eavesdropping” in California is a felony and “even if someone is a conservator for the person” that’s clandestinely being electronically recorded, he would “think that that would be prohibited and completely inappropriate.”

The household legislation lawyer identified that Federline and Britney’s two sons, Sean Preston, 16, and Jayden James, 15, are minors and subsequently couldn’t give permission to be recorded.

“They certainly couldn’t give their consent and certainly Kevin would never agree to such a thing,” he stated.

When requested whether or not Federline would press costs over the alleged safety points, Kaplan instructed us, “Kevin would be making the decision on that.”

Earlier on Monday, Britney’s personal legal professional, Mathew Rosengart, additionally blasted Jamie over the spying allegations.

He instructed Web page Six following a damning court docket submitting, “Placing a listening device in Britney’s bedroom would be particularly horrifying and corroborates so much of her compelling, poignant testimony. Mr. Spears has crossed unfathomable lines.”

A court docket date is about for Wednesday, Sept. 29, by which a decide might determine whether or not Jamie can be completely faraway from his daughter’s conservatorship and whether or not or not the guardianship will be terminated altogether.


Kaplan beforehand instructed Web page Six that the termination of Britney’s conservatorship doesn’t assure a change within the exes’ custodial case. Federline and Britney have a 70-30 custody agreement within the DJ’s favor.

“Would the fact alone of the conservatorship being terminated in and of itself make Kevin agree to change the existing custody order? No,” he instructed us in June, citing some of the medical care Britney allegedly received whereas underneath the conservatorship. “Kevin needs to be able to have some information to inform his judgment on what that order should be.”

Federline obtained engaged in June 2004 after two months of courting. They had been married from October 2004 to July 2007. The previous backup dancer additionally has 4 youngsters from different relationships.

Britney is at present engaged to fiancé Sam Asghari, and has expressed a need to have extra kids.

To learn extra from the New York Put up, click here.

Source link